<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruminations on the VP hunt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libertariansforobama.org/2008/06/06/ruminations-on-the-vp-hunt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libertariansforobama.org/2008/06/06/ruminations-on-the-vp-hunt/</link>
	<description>...and you should be too</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CYNICAL</title>
		<link>http://www.libertariansforobama.org/2008/06/06/ruminations-on-the-vp-hunt/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>CYNICAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertariansforobama.org/?p=12#comment-28</guid>
		<description>The idea that the person receiving the second largest amount of votes should be Vice President comes from the days before parties and primaries. In the general election, the person receiving the second highest total was VP. Not a bad idea, but I wouldn't want McCain to be assistant manager at my local Wal-Mart, let alone VP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea that the person receiving the second largest amount of votes should be Vice President comes from the days before parties and primaries. In the general election, the person receiving the second highest total was VP. Not a bad idea, but I wouldn&#8217;t want McCain to be assistant manager at my local Wal-Mart, let alone VP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
