<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Libertarians for Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libertariansforobama.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libertariansforobama.org</link>
	<description>...and you should be too</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Ruminations on the VP hunt by CYNICAL</title>
		<link>http://www.libertariansforobama.org/2008/06/06/ruminations-on-the-vp-hunt/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>CYNICAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertariansforobama.org/?p=12#comment-28</guid>
		<description>The idea that the person receiving the second largest amount of votes should be Vice President comes from the days before parties and primaries. In the general election, the person receiving the second highest total was VP. Not a bad idea, but I wouldn't want McCain to be assistant manager at my local Wal-Mart, let alone VP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea that the person receiving the second largest amount of votes should be Vice President comes from the days before parties and primaries. In the general election, the person receiving the second highest total was VP. Not a bad idea, but I wouldn&#8217;t want McCain to be assistant manager at my local Wal-Mart, let alone VP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Libertarian support for Obama by Libertarian support for Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.libertariansforobama.org/2008/06/05/libertarian-support-for-obama/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Libertarian support for Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 04:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertariansforobama.org/2008/06/05/libertarian-support-for-obama/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>[...] Continue Reading [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Continue Reading [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shrinking government in the post-Super Tuesday political landscape by NikRitchie</title>
		<link>http://www.libertariansforobama.org/2008/02/08/shrinking-government/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>NikRitchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 17:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertariansforobama.org/2008/02/08/shrinking-government/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Hey, I'm enjoying your commentary. It's convincing. Why does it stop at February? I'd like to hear more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;m enjoying your commentary. It&#8217;s convincing. Why does it stop at February? I&#8217;d like to hear more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shrinking government in the post-Super Tuesday political landscape by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.libertariansforobama.org/2008/02/08/shrinking-government/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 23:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertariansforobama.org/2008/02/08/shrinking-government/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I like your blog, William. But it looks like you haven't had the opportunity to post for a while. If you or any of your readers are interested, I also maintain a "Libertarians for Obama" blog at libertarianobama.blogspot.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your blog, William. But it looks like you haven&#8217;t had the opportunity to post for a while. If you or any of your readers are interested, I also maintain a &#8220;Libertarians for Obama&#8221; blog at libertarianobama.blogspot.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shrinking government in the post-Super Tuesday political landscape by KenH</title>
		<link>http://www.libertariansforobama.org/2008/02/08/shrinking-government/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>KenH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 04:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertariansforobama.org/2008/02/08/shrinking-government/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this website, William.  As a libertarian I am also an Obama supporter.

Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this website, William.  As a libertarian I am also an Obama supporter.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Libertarians for Obama? by Francis Vorhies</title>
		<link>http://www.libertariansforobama.org/2008/02/01/why-libertarians-for-obama/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Vorhies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertariansforobama.org/?p=3#comment-16</guid>
		<description>America's failed imperialism in Iraq has proven that America's militaristic approach to international relations is neither in our planet's interest nor in the interest of America.

We all know what has come out of the Irag invasion -- decreased international security, increased oil prices, decreased respect for America and its underlying values, increased government spending, decreased economic development, and increased human suffering.

However, we will never reduce the size of the US military budget and the use of military options until we have leadership which engages constructively with the international community and considers the real human consequences of America's reckless militarism.

Clearly libertarians or libertarian-leaning citizens need to support Obama as the best candidate for promoting peaceful -- and dare I say 'liberal'? -- approaches to the many serious problems facing our planet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America&#8217;s failed imperialism in Iraq has proven that America&#8217;s militaristic approach to international relations is neither in our planet&#8217;s interest nor in the interest of America.</p>
<p>We all know what has come out of the Irag invasion &#8212; decreased international security, increased oil prices, decreased respect for America and its underlying values, increased government spending, decreased economic development, and increased human suffering.</p>
<p>However, we will never reduce the size of the US military budget and the use of military options until we have leadership which engages constructively with the international community and considers the real human consequences of America&#8217;s reckless militarism.</p>
<p>Clearly libertarians or libertarian-leaning citizens need to support Obama as the best candidate for promoting peaceful &#8212; and dare I say &#8216;liberal&#8217;? &#8212; approaches to the many serious problems facing our planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About the site by Francis Vorhies</title>
		<link>http://www.libertariansforobama.org/about/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Vorhies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Excellent! Well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent! Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Libertarians for Obama? by DDH</title>
		<link>http://www.libertariansforobama.org/2008/02/01/why-libertarians-for-obama/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>DDH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertariansforobama.org/?p=3#comment-13</guid>
		<description>My Endorsement as a German Libertarian:

http://dominikhennig.blogspot.com/2008/01/america-needs-change.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Endorsement as a German Libertarian:</p>
<p><a href="http://dominikhennig.blogspot.com/2008/01/america-needs-change.html" rel="nofollow">http://dominikhennig.blogspot.com/2008/01/america-needs-change.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Libertarians for Obama? by En Toute Liberté: blog de Guillaume Varès</title>
		<link>http://www.libertariansforobama.org/2008/02/01/why-libertarians-for-obama/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>En Toute Liberté: blog de Guillaume Varès</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertariansforobama.org/?p=3#comment-12</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Des libertariens pour Obama?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Les primaires en vue des élections présidentielles américaines ont cette année une résonance médiatique considérable. Les sommes dépensées par les candidats n&#8217;ont jamais été aussi élevées et la participation aux primaires atteint des...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Des libertariens pour Obama?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Les primaires en vue des élections présidentielles américaines ont cette année une résonance médiatique considérable. Les sommes dépensées par les candidats n&#8217;ont jamais été aussi élevées et la participation aux primaires atteint des&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Libertarians for Obama? by musefree</title>
		<link>http://www.libertariansforobama.org/2008/02/01/why-libertarians-for-obama/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>musefree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertariansforobama.org/?p=3#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Thanks for creating this site, William.

None of the candidates with a realistic chance of winning can be described as libertarian, but Obama looks like the best choice.

Regarding position on free markets, have a look at this link.

http://volokh.com/posts/1202297113.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for creating this site, William.</p>
<p>None of the candidates with a realistic chance of winning can be described as libertarian, but Obama looks like the best choice.</p>
<p>Regarding position on free markets, have a look at this link.</p>
<p><a href="http://volokh.com/posts/1202297113.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://volokh.com/posts/1202297113.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
